MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991786253 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.10051

Canadian guidelines for treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a focus on intravescal therapy

2010· article· en· W1991786253 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Wassim Kassouf, Ashish M. Kamat, Alexander Zlotta, Bernard H. Bochner, Ronald B. Moore, Alan So, Jonathan I. Izawa, Ricardo Rendon, Louis Lacombe, Armen Aprikian

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of British Columbia HospitalUniversity of AlbertaDalhousie UniversityUniversity of TorontoHôtel-Dieu de QuébecMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBladder cancerFocus (optics)CancerMedicineIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2008, bladder cancer was estimated to be the fourthmost common male cancer accounting for 6% of all can -cers and the eighth highest cancer-related mortality rate inCanadian men. The most common type is urothelial carci-noma (greater than 90%), followed by adenocarcinoma,squamous cell and small cell carcinoma. Risk factors thathave been associated with bladder cancer include smok -ing, chronic inflammatory changes in the bladder (due topersistent bladder stones, recurrent urinary tract infections,indwelling catheters or schistosomiasis) and chemothera -peutic exposure, such as cyclophosphamide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207