Characteristics of an HPRT-deficient Chinese hamster cell line
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A mutant Chinese hamster cell line was selected from wild-type CHW cells in 30 µg/ml 8-azaguanine, after exposure for 2 h to 10–3 M methyl methanesulphonate. This line was subsequently cloned and one clone, isolated in 10 µg/ml 8-azaguanine (CHW-1102), was selected for further study. CHW-1102 showed stability of resistance to 8-azaguanine after six months of growth in nonselective medium and an LD50 to 8-azaguanine of between 10 and 20 µg/ml, compared to 2.5 µg/ml for the wild-type CHW cell line. The doubling time in culture was found to be 13 h, compared to a doubling time of 12 h for CHW. Biochemical studies showed that the mutant cell line CHW-1102 had a specific activity of HPRT of about 1–2 nmol/mg protein per hour compared to a specific activity of the wild type of 200 nmol/mg protein per hour. The spontaneous reversion rate from 8-azaguanine resistance to 8-azaguanine sensitivity was 4.23 × 10–8/locus per generation. Both the parental line (CHW) and the mutant (CHW-1102) have a modal chromosome number of 22 and a relatively stable karyotype. Both lines show some chromosome rearrangement and, in particular, the presence of one long acrocentric marker chromosome, which consists largely of material from chromosomes 6 and 8. Much of the distal part of the long arm of the X chromosome, which is heterochromatic, has been lost in both CHW and CHW-1102. So far as can be determined, no autosomal material, except perhaps the paracentromeric region of chromosome 6, is missing in CHW-1102, although even this material may be represented by a small marker chromosome M2. Both cell lines show characteristics that are of value for the study of mammalian cell genetics, and CHW-1102 represents a useful addition to the stock of mutant mammalian cell lines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".