MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991837167 · doi:10.1063/1.2710955

Effect of pressure on the itinerant ferromagnet CoS2: A first-principles study

2007· article· en· W1991837167 on OpenAlexafffund
Xubo Liu, Z. Altounian

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsMagnetic momentLattice constantFerromagnetismBulk modulusDensity functional theoryChemistryElectronic band structureThermodynamicsPhysicsComputational chemistryQuantum mechanicsDiffraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electronic structure and magnetic properties of CoS2 with a cubic-pyrite-type structure have been studied by a first-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculation using a linear muffin-tin orbital method within the framework of the generalized gradient approximation for the treatment of exchange-correlation effects. The total energy and magnetic moments are calculated as a function of lattice constant. The calculated lattice constant and magnetic moments are in good agreement with the experimental results. The pressure-volume relationship is obtained by fitting the calculated total energy to the universal equation of state. The derived bulk modulus is 137GPa and the equilibrium volume is 42.16Å3∕f.u. The calculated Co magnetic moment decreases at a rate of −0.0055μB∕GPa as the external pressure less than 3.6GPa, in agreement with the experimental value of −0.005μB∕GPa. The DFT calculations predict the occurrence of a first order pressure induced magnetic transition in CoS2 at a high pressure (12GPa), which is qualitatively consistent with the experimental data which show that the ferromagnetic state in CoS2 is unstable at external pressures higher than 6GPa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicMagnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materialsFrench-language works237,207