Role of ascorbate in lung cellular toxicity mediated by light-exposed parenteral nutrition solution
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neonatal lung injury has been induced experimentally by infusion of multivitamin-containing light-exposed parenteral nutrition (PN) solutions. The objective was to explore the role of ascorbate in toxic effects of light-exposed PN on primary cultured foetal rat lung epithelial cells. Hydroperoxides were measured in 3% amino acid solutions at baseline, immediately after addition of either multivitamins or ascorbate alone (400 μg/mL) and again after a 24-h period of exposure to (or protection from) ambient light. Cellular toxicity was assessed by [C(14)]adenine release. Multivitamins or ascorbate alone increased hydroperoxides in PN, which was attenuated by light protection. Light-exposed PN containing multivitamins was more toxic to cells than baseline or light-protected PN. Exposure to ascorbate at concentrations both lower (< 5 μg/mL) and higher (> 1000 μg/mL) than normally contained in PN-induced oxidant-mediated cell death, as indicated by protective effects of hydroperoxide and hydroxyl radical scavengers. This study concludes that ascorbate generates toxic amounts of peroxide in PN solutions. The types and physiological importance of hydroperoxides induced by pro-oxidant effects of ascorbate require further evaluation in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it