Multiple-antenna communication systems: an emerging technology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A recent development in wireless communications is the application of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems to radio communications via use of multiple antennas. In order to investigate the technologys potential, an experimental MIMO system containing two four-element antenna arrays (4x4) has been developed at the University of Alberta. The system is used to obtain MIMO channel measurements in a typical indoor office environment in the ISM band (902-928 MHz). Measurement campaigns have been performed using different antenna spacings and two different types of antenna: half-wavelength (lambda/2) centre-fed dipoles and dual-polarized patches. The measurements are used to calculate channel capacities for an indoor 4x4 MIMO system. The measurements confirm the high capacity potential of a MIMO channel, with ergodic capacity of approximately 21 bits per channel use available with either antenna type at a signal-to-noise ratio of 20 dB if the antenna element separation is lambda/2 or larger. An introduction to basic MIMO theory, a discussion of the University of Alberta wireless MIMO testbed, and observations regarding the measured indoor MIMO channel are presented in the paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".