A 5-year study of seasonal patterns in mesozooplankton community structure in a sub-Arctic fjord reveals dominance of Microsetella norvegica (Crustacea, Copepoda)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study presents data from a multi-year zooplankton sampling programme with year-round monthly sampling in a sub-Arctic fjord in Greenland (Godtha bsfjord). A total of 56 zooplankton groups were identified over 5 years, with the copepod Microsetella norvegica dominating the mesozooplankton community. Microsetella norvegica was found to be very abundant (maximum abundance: 408 125 + 161 387 nauplii m 23 and 91 995 + 6 864 copepodites m 23 ) and to make up, on average, 87% of the annual copepod assemblage. There was a seasonal zooplankton succession whereby Cirripedia nauplii dominated the biomass in March and April, and Calanus spp. dominated in May and June, followed by M. norvegica from July to September. The total copepod biomass peaked in August (71 + 10 mg C m 23 ), mainly (68% on average) due to biomass of M. norvegica, indicating that small copepods are important in this system. This multi-year study describes inter-annual variation in species abundance and seasonal succession. Fjord-ocean interactions, tidal mixing and the extensive freshwater run-off from the Greenland Ice Sheet
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it