MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991936083 · doi:10.1021/om800625f

Copper(II) Ethylene Polymerization Catalysts: Do They Really Exist?

2008· article· en· W1991936083 on OpenAlexaff
Jeremy A. Olson, Ramon Cornell Boyd, J. Wilson Quail, S.R. Foley

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiimineMethylaluminoxaneChemistryEthylenePolymerizationLigand (biochemistry)Polymer chemistryCopperMoietyCatalysisChain transferPhotochemistryMetalloceneOrganic chemistryRadical polymerizationPolymerReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reactions of two types of copper(II) ethylene polymerization catalysts, [(sal)CuCl] 2 (sal = 2-{C(H)═N(2,6- i Pr 2 -C 6 H 3 )}-4,6- t Bu 2 -phenoxide) and (α-diimine)CuCl 2 (α-diimine = [(2,6- i Pr 2 -C 6 H 3 )N═C(Me)] 2 ), with methylaluminoxane (MAO) and trimethylaluminum (TMA) have been investigated. In both examples, facile and irreversible ligand (L) transfer from copper to TMA present in MAO was observed, resulting in formation of the corresponding (sal)AlMe 2 and (imino-amido)AlMe 2 complexes. The (imino-amido)AlMe 2 complex is formed by α-diimine ligand transfer to aluminum followed by alkylation of one imino moiety in the ligand backbone. Both aluminum complexes were active catalysts for ethylene polymerization with activities similar to their Cu(II) precursors. Simple addition of a neutral salicylaldimine or α-diimine ligand to MAO in the absence of any copper species resulted in the formation of the corresponding LAlMe 2 complexes, which are again active for ethylene polymerization. These results indicate that ethylene polymerization does not occur by a migratory insertion mechanism at the copper center, but is the result of ligand transfer to aluminum, and it is the resulting LAlMe 2 /LAlMe + complexes that are likely the active species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207