MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1991953352 · doi:10.1080/0950083021000058054

Photoinduced volume changes related to photoinduced anisotropy in chalcogenide glasses

2003· article· en· W1991953352 on OpenAlexafffund
V. K. Tikhomirov, K. Asatryan, Tigran Galstian, Réal Vallée, Angela B. Seddon

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilosophical Magazine Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhase-change materials and chalcogenides
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersUniversité Laval
KeywordsChalcogenideChalcogenvan der Waals forceAnisotropyVan der Waals radiusChalcogenide glassChemistryChemical physicsCovalent bondMaterials scienceMetastabilityCrystallographyMoleculeOpticsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report metastable photoinduced volume expansion (hyperexpansion) of up to 10 µm in height and several millimetres in diameter for the chalcogenide glass As 2 S 3 . This is an order of magnitude larger than reported to date in any material, including chalcogenide glasses. We suggest a model for the effect and propose that its origin is similar to the origin of photoinduced anisotropy in glassy chalcogenides proposed earlier. The model is based on the anisotropic chemical bonding found in most chalcogenide glasses; the anisotropy arises from the fact that chalcogen atoms exhibit both strong covalent bonding and weak van der Waals bonding. The origin of the photoinduced volume changes (expansion and contraction) is in a thermally induced diffusion, or athermal tunnelling, of photoexcited chalcogen atoms, with possible subsequent sublimation from the sample surface. The primary role of hyperpolarizable van der Waals bonds is supported by the absence of photoinduced volume changes in the chalcogenide glass Ga 1.4 La 0.6 S 3, in which chalcogen atoms do not bond via van der Waals bonds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilosophical Magazine LettersSame topicPhase-change materials and chalcogenidesFrench-language works237,207