Fluorescence studies of a series of monodisperse telechelic α,ω-dipyrenyl poly(<i>N</i>-isopropylacrylamide)s in ethanol and in water
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence measurements were performed on solutions in ethanol and in water (23 °C) of a series of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)s labeled with a pyrenyl group at each chain end (Py 2 -PNIPAM) and ranging in molecular weight (M n ) from 5 900 to 44 500 g·mol −1 . Water and ethanol are of similar solvent quality towards the PNIPAM chain. The pyrene labels, in contrast, are soluble in ethanol but not in water. The efficiency of excimer formation for Py 2 -PNIPAM samples in ethanol decreased with increasing chain length, a trend typical of pyrene end-labeled polymers in good solvents. The ratio I E /I M , where I E is the Py excimer emission intensity and I M is the Py monomer emission intensity, scaled as M n −1.4 , where M n is the number-average molecular weight of the sample. The kinetics of excimer formation were more complex for aqueous Py 2 -PNIPAM solutions, as a consequence of pyrene–pyrene association prior to excitation. The excimer time-dependent profiles exhibited significantly faster rise times, compared with the situation in ethanol, and they could not be fitted with the traditional Birks scheme. The results are discussed in the context of the solution properties of telechelic amphiphilic PNIPAMs and are compared with data gathered previously in studies of dipyrenyl end-labeled poly(ethylene oxides), the only other polymers soluble in water and organic solvents subjected to similar studies in the past.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".