MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Diurnal and seasonal variation in methane emissions in a northern Canadian peatland measured by eddy covariance

2009· article· en· W1992045577 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kevin D. Long, Lawrence B. Flanagan, Tiebo Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Change Biology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric SciencesBIOCAP Canada
KeywordsEddy covarianceEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesFlux (metallurgy)Diurnal temperature variationPeatEcosystemSeasonalityRadiative forcingGrowing seasonClimate changeChemistryEcologyBiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Eddy covariance measurements of methane (CH 4 ) net flux were made in a boreal fen, typical of the most abundant peatlands in western Canada during May–September 2007. The objectives of this study were to determine: (i) the magnitude of diurnal and seasonal variation in CH 4 net flux, (ii) the relationship between the temporally varying flux rates and associated changes in controlling biotic and abiotic factors, and (iii) the contribution of CH 4 emission to the ecosystem growing season carbon budget. There was significant diurnal variation in CH 4 emission during the peak of the growing season that was strongly correlated with associated changes in solar radiation, latent heat flux, air temperature and ecosystem conductance to water vapor. During days 181–215, nighttime average CH 4 efflux was only 47% of the average midday values. The peak value for daily average CH 4 emission rate was approximately 80 nmol m −2 s −1 (4.6 mg CH 4 m −2 h −1 ), and seasonal variation in CH 4 flux was strongly correlated with changes in soil temperature. Integrated over the entire measurement period [days 144–269 (late May–late September)], the total CH 4 emission was 3.2 g CH 4 m −2 , which was quite low relative to other wetland ecosystems and to the simultaneous high rate of ecosystem net CO 2 sequestration that was measured (18.1 mol CO 2 m −2 or 217 g C m −2 ). We estimate that the negative radiative forcing (cooling) associated with net carbon storage over the life of the peatland (approximately 2200 years) was at least twice the value of positive radiative forcing (warming) caused by net CH 4 emission over the last 50 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score0.848

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations156
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Change BiologySame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207