A Comparative Mass‐Spectrometric Study of Plasma‐ and Vacuum Ultraviolet Ablation of Selected Polymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Energetic photons (UV, VUV radiation and soft X rays), and particles (ions, electrons, metastable excited atoms) from inert gas plasmas possess sufficient energy to induce multiple bond scission reactions in the macromolecular chains of most polymers. As a result, volatile products of varying molecular weights escape from the polymers' surfaces; they can be captured and identified by mass spectrometry (MS). We report an MS‐based study of five commercial polymers, polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and polyamide that were exposed to inert gas (He, Ar) plasmas and to near‐monochromatic (λ = 121.6 nm) VUV irradiation. For the cases of PE and PP, quantitative analyses of the most abundant reaction products (H2, C1–C7 alkanes) are compared among the various polymer/excitation‐source cases, and with regard to literature data for γ irradiation. magnified image
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".