Roles for MSI2 and PROX1 in hematopoietic stem cell activity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The MSI2 and PROX1 proteins are increasingly recognized for their critical roles in the biology of primitive hematopoietic cells and for their potential contributions to leukemic pathogenesis. Here we summarize the studies that have shed light on the hematopoietic-specific roles of MSI2 and PROX1 and give an overview of the molecular mechanisms underlying their function. RECENT FINDINGS: In addition to a likely role in cell cycle restraint, the hematopoietic stem cell agonist MSI2 is essential for the maintenance of primitive cell fate through ensuring appropriate balance between self-renewal and differentiation. Overexpression of Msi2 can contribute to the progression of murine myeloid leukemia and in the human setting is associated with poor prognosis. Regulatory control imposed by MSI2 may be achieved partly through regulation of the Notch signaling pathway. Prox1 behaves in an opposing manner to Msi2, resulting in elevated stem cell numbers when depleted. It has a potential role in cell cycle control and may act at the level of primitive hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells as it does in other systems by directly promoting commitment and differentiation. PROX1 functions as a tumor suppressor in numerous tissue types and has been found mutated in hematopoietic cell lines and primary blood malignancies. SUMMARY: Deciphering the molecular mechanisms through which MSI2 and PROX1 affect primitive hematopoietic cell fate will provide insight into the regulation of normal hematopoiesis and facilitate better understanding of the leukemic transformation process. This will be directly applicable to the development of effective regenerative therapies and targeted leukemia treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".