COMBINED IMMUNOSUPPRESSION OF MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL AND FK506 FOR MYOBLAST TRANSPLANTATION IN mdx MICE1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Overcoming adverse effects of immunosuppressors can be achieved by combining different drugs, thus allowing a dosage reduction. Myoblast transplantation is a potential therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Our research group previously established that FK506 (tacrolimus) is an effective immunosuppressive drug for myoblast transplantation in mice and monkeys. METHODS: In the present study, a reduced dose of FK506 at 1.0 mg/kg/day was used in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; 80 mg/kg/day) as an immunosuppressive protocol for myoblast transplantation. Graft success was evaluated by quantifying the number of dystrophin-positive fibers per muscle section that were injected with normal cells. RESULTS: MMF used alone could not prevent immune rejection of the transplanted myoblasts. MMF given in combination with FK506 immediately after transplantation reduced the success of myoblast transplantation by about 50%. A low dose of FK506 combined with MMF after the establishment of the graft (3 weeks) maintained graft success and controlled immune infiltration compared with a low dose of FK506 alone. However, lymphocyte infiltration was observed at longer term using a low dose of FK506 combined with MMF. CONCLUSIONS: The diminution of graft success when combining FK506 and MMF by the time of myoblast transplantation could be attributed to the inhibition of myoblast fusion by MMF. The use of MMF and FK506 after the establishment of the graft did not reduce graft success, however, this combination was not effective at controlling long-term immune rejection in comparison with the optimal dose of FK506 alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".