Hoechst 33342 efflux identifies a subpopulation of cytogenetically normal CD34+CD38− progenitor cells from patients with acute myeloid leukemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Efflux of Hoechst 33342 from normal hematopoietic cells identifies a "side population" (SP(+)) of negatively staining cells that, in the mouse, are largely CD34(-) and are enriched for primitive progenitors. To further characterize human SP(+) cells, blood or bone marrow from 16 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was analyzed for their presence, immunophenotype, and cytogenetic and functional properties, and for the relation between SP phenotype and multidrug resistance-1 (MDR-1) expression. The mean percentages of SP(+) and MDR(+) cells was 8.1% (range, 0.5%-29.9%) and 12.8% (range, 0%-54.8%), respectively, with no correlation between the 2 values. The percentages of SP(+) cells that were CD34(+)CD38(-), CD34(+)CD38(+), or CD34(-) were 12% (range, 0.4%-50%), 25% (range, 0.5%-96%), and 63% (range, 4%-99%). Cytogenetically abnormal cells were always detected in the SP(-)CD34(+)CD38(-) and SP(+)CD34(-) fractions, and abnormal colonies (CFC), long-term culture-initiating cells (LTC-IC), and nonobese diabetic-severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mouse leukemia-IC were detected in the former fraction. No progenitors were detected among SP(+)CD34(-) cells in any of these assays from 9 of 10 samples. In contrast, exclusively normal cells were detected in the SP(+)CD34(+)CD38(-) fraction from 9 of 15 samples, and CFC, LTC-IC, and multilineage engraftment in NOD/SCID mice from this subpopulation were also cytogenetically normal in 6 of 8, 6 of 7, and 2 of 2 cases studied, respectively. In contrast to murine studies, primitive progenitors are enriched among SP(+)CD34(+)CD38(-) cells from patients with AML. The molecular basis for Hoechst dye efflux is uncertain because it does not appear to be related to MDR-1 expression. (Blood. 2001;97:3882-3889)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".