Heparin-Bonded Central Venous Catheters Do Not Reduce Thrombosis in Infants With Congenital Heart Disease: A Blinded Randomized, Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Infants with congenital heart disease who require central venous lines are at increased risk of thrombosis. Heparin-bonded catheters provide protection from thrombotic events in some children. However, heparin-bonded catheters may not be as effective in infants </=1 year old because of other potential risk factors (smaller vessel size, longer duration of catheter use). No studies have assessed the benefit of heparin-bonded catheters in such specific high-risk populations. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of heparin-bonded catheters for preventing thrombosis in infants aged </=1 year with congenital heart disease. STUDY DESIGN: This study was designed as a randomized, controlled, blinded single-center trial. Infants </=1 year old with congenital heart disease requiring a central venous line for clinical care were randomly assigned to receive either a heparin-bonded catheter or a standard non-heparin-bonded catheter. Catheters were visually indistinguishable. The primary outcome was incidences of both silent and clinically noticeable thrombosis confirmed by ultrasound. Ultrasounds were reviewed by a blinded central adjudication committee. Interim analysis was performed after enrollment of 97 patients. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were evaluable (41 of the patients were female). Thrombotic events occurred in 17 (42.5%) of 40 patients in the non-heparin-bonded catheter group and in 21 (44.7%) of 47 patients in the heparin-bonded catheters group. The study was stopped when the interim analysis showed convincing evidence for no difference between groups over the alternative hypothesis of 50% risk reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Infants with congenital heart disease are at significant risk of both silent and clinically identified thrombosis. There seems to be no advantage in using heparin-bonded catheters in infants </=1 year of age.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".