MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992193257 · doi:10.1002/hbm.20370

Functional organization of human visual cortex in occipital polymicrogyria

2007· article· en· W1992193257 on OpenAlexafffund
Serge O. Dumoulin, Jeffrey Jirsch, Andrea Bernasconi

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Brain Mapping · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicVisual perception and processing mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPolymicrogyriaVisual cortexNeuroscienceVisual fieldCortex (anatomy)Visual systemRetinotopyPsychologyOccipital lobeFunctional magnetic resonance imagingAnatomyBiologyEpilepsy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polymicrogyrias (PMG) are cortical malformations resulting from developmental abnormalities. In animal models PMG has been associated with abnormal anatomy, function, and organization. The purpose of this study was to describe the function and organization of human polymicrogyric cortex using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Three patients with epilepsy and bilateral parasagittal occipital polymicrogyri were studied. They all had normal vision as tested by Humphrey visual field perimetry. The functional organization of the visual cortex was reconstructed using phase-encoded retinotopic mapping analysis. This method sequentially stimulates each point in the visual field along the axes of a polar-coordinate system, thereby reconstructing the representation of the visual field on the cortex. We found normal cortical responses and organization of early visual areas (V1, V2, and V3/VP). The locations of these visual areas overlapped substantially with the PMG. In five out of six hemispheres the reconstructed primary visual cortex completely fell within polymicrogyric areas. Our results suggest that human polymicrogyric cortex is not only organized in a normal fashion, but is also actively involved in processing of visual information and contributes to normal visual perception.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.663
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Brain MappingSame topicVisual perception and processing mechanismsFrench-language works237,207