MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992229928 · doi:10.1021/ja012629n

Effect of Pressure on Coupled Electronic Ground and Excited States Determined from Luminescence Spectra of <i>trans-</i>Dioxorhenium(V) Complexes

2002· article· en· W1992229928 on OpenAlexaff
John K. Grey, Ian S. Butler, Christian Reber

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryExcited stateEthylenediamineLuminescenceAnharmonicityPotential energyGround stateVibronic spectroscopySpectral lineAtomic physicsElectronic structureMolecular physicsComputational chemistryInorganic chemistryCondensed matter physicsOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pressure-dependent luminescence spectra of trans-dioxo complexes of rhenium(V) with ancillary ethylenediamine ligands exhibit resolved vibronic structure in the O=Re=O symmetric stretching mode at room temperature. The intensity distribution within the vibronic progression changes with pressure, leading to band shapes that are also pressure-dependent. These spectroscopic features arise from coupled electronic states and depend on the energy differences between ground and excited states, which vary by 2500 cm(-1) for the three complexes with ethylenediamine, tetramethylethylenediamine, and tetraethylethylenediamine ancillary ligands. We describe the pressure-dependent vibronic structure and band shapes with anharmonic adiabatic potential energy surfaces for the ground states of all complexes. The calculated spectra reveal the pressure dependence of the energies of electronic origins, luminescence band maximums, offsets between ground- and emitting-state potential minimums, and vibrational frequencies. The largest pressure effects are observed where the coupled electronic states are close in energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicMetal-Catalyzed Oxygenation MechanismsFrench-language works237,207