Description of <i>Rhynchopus euleeides</i> n. sp. (Diplonemea), a Free‐Living Marine Euglenozoan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe Rhynchopus euleeides n. sp., using light and electron microscopy. This free-living flagellate, which was isolated earlier from a marine habitat, can be grown axenically in a rich medium based on modified seawater. In the trophic stage, cells are predominantly elliptical and laterally flattened, but frequently change their shape (metaboly). Gliding is the predominant manner of locomotion. The two flagella, which are typically concealed in their pocket, are short stubs of unequal length, have conventional axonemes, but apparently lack a paraxonemal rod. Swarmer cells, which form only occasionally, are smaller in size and carry two conspicuous flagella of more than 2 times the body length. Cells are decorated with a prominent apical papillum. Both the flagellar pocket and the adjacent feeding apparatus seem to merge together into a single sub-apical opening. The mitochondrion, which is most likely single, is located peripherally. It is reticulated in shape and contains only a few lamellar cristae. Mitochondrial DNA is abundant and evenly distributed throughout the organelle. Morphological synapomorphies confirm the affiliation of the species with the genus Rhynchopus (Diplonemea, Euglenozoa). We discuss the characters that distinguish Rhynchopus from Diplonema corroborating the validity of the two genera.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".