MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992375147 · doi:10.1096/fj.14-253369

A novel platform for engineering blood‐brain barrier‐crossing bispecific biologics

2014· article· en· W1992375147 on OpenAlexaff
Graham K. Farrington, Nadia L. Caram‐Salas, Arsalan S. Haqqani, Eric Brunette, John Eldredge, Blake Pepinsky, Giovanna Antognetti, Ewa Baumann, Wen Ding, Ellen A. Garber, Susan X. Jiang, Christie E. Delaney, Eve Boileau, William P. Sisk, Danica Stanimirovic

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntibodyPotencyBlood–brain barrierTranscytosisPharmacologyPharmacokineticsBiodistributionChemistryIn vivoMedicineImmunologyIn vitroCentral nervous systemBiologyInternal medicineReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The blood‐brain barrier (BBB) prevents the access of therapeutic antibodies to central nervous system (CNS) targets. The engineering of bispecific antibodies in which a therapeutic “arm” is combined with a BBB‐transcytosing arm can significantly enhance their brain delivery. The BBB‐permeable single‐domain antibody FC5 was previously isolated by phenotypic panning of a naive llama single‐domain antibody phage display library. In this study, FC5 was engineered as a mono‐ and bivalent fusion with the human Fc domain to optimize it as a modular brain delivery platform. In vitro studies demonstrated that the bivalent fusion of FC5 with Fc increased the rate of transcytosis ( P app ) across brain endothelial monolayer by 25% compared with monovalent fusion. Up to a 30‐fold enhanced apparent brain exposure (derived from serum and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetic profiles) of FC5‐compared with control domain antibody‐Fc fusions after systemic dosing in rats was observed. Systemic pharmacological potency was evaluated in the Hargreaves model of inflammatory pain using the BBB‐impermeable neuropeptides dalargin and neuropeptide Y chemically conjugated with FC5‐Fc fusion proteins. Improved serum pharmacokinetics of Fc‐fused FC5 contributed to a 60‐fold increase in pharmacological potency compared with the single‐domain version of FC5; bivalent and monovalent FC5 fusions with Fc exhibited similar systemic pharmacological potency. The study demonstrates that modular incorporation of FC5 as the BBB‐carrier arm in bispecific antibodies or antibody‐drug conjugates offers an avenue to develop pharmacologically active biotherapeutics for CNS indications.—Farrington, G. K., Caram‐Salas, N., Haqqani, A. S., Brunette, E., Eldredge, J., Pepinsky, B., Antognetti, G., Baumann, E., Ding, W., Garber, E., Jiang, S., Delaney, C., Boileau, E., Sisk, W. P., Stanimirovic, D. B., A novel platform for engineering blood‐brain barrier‐crossing bispecific biologics. FASEB J. 28, 4764–4778 (2014). www.fasebj.org

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations146
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchFrench-language works237,207