MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992382712 · doi:10.1063/1.2723181

Direct observation of the donor nuclear spin in a near-gap bound exciton transition: P31 in highly enriched S28i

2007· article· en· W1992382712 on OpenAlexaff
M. L. W. Thewalt, A. Yang, Michael F. Steger, D. Karaiskaj, M. Cardona, H. Riemann, N. V. Abrosimov, A. V. Gusev, А. Д. Буланов, D. Yu. Kovalev, A. K. Kaliteevskiĭ, O. N. Godisov, Peter Becker, H.‐J. Pohl, E. E. Häller, Joel W. Ager, Kohei M. Itoh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and electron transport phenomena
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZeeman effectHyperfine structureExcitonPhotoluminescenceAtomic physicsSpectroscopyBiexcitonBound stateSpin (aerodynamics)ChemistryAuger effectPhysicsMolecular physicsCondensed matter physicsAugerOptoelectronicsMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on ultrahigh resolution studies of the bound exciton states associated with the shallow acceptor B and the shallow donor P in highly enriched S28i using a tuneable single frequency laser to perform photoluminescence excitation spectroscopy. The linewidths and fine structure of the transitions, which were too narrow to be resolved previously using an available photoluminescence apparatus, are now fully revealed. The P bound exciton transition shows a complicated additional structure, which the Zeeman spectroscopy demonstrates to be a result of the splitting of the donor ground state by the hyperfine interaction between the spin of the donor electron and that of the P31 nucleus. The P31 nuclear spin populations can thus be determined, and hopefully modified, by optical means. The predominant Auger recombination channel of these bound excitons is used to observe the same resolved hyperfine transitions in the photocurrent spectrum. This demonstrates that donors in specific electronic and nuclear spin configurations can be selectively photoionized. Possible applications of these results to quantum computing and quantum information systems are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicQuantum and electron transport phenomenaFrench-language works237,207