<i>DPP4</i>Gene DNA Methylation in the Omentum is Associated With Its Gene Expression and Plasma Lipid Profile in Severe Obesity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Severely obese subjects with the metabolic syndrome (MS) have higher dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) expression in their visceral adipose tissue (VAT) compared to obese individuals without MS. We tested the hypothesis that methylation level of CpG sites in the DPP4 promoter CpG island in VAT was genotype-dependent and associated with DPP4 mRNA abundance and MS-related phenotypes. The VAT DNA was extracted in 92 severely obese premenopausal women undergoing biliopancreatic derivation for the treatment of obesity. Women were nondiabetic and none of them used medication to treat MS features. Cytosine methylation rates (%) of 102 CpG sites in the DPP4 CpG island were assessed by pyrosequencing of sodium bisulfite-treated DNA. Methylation rates were >10% for CpG sites 94-102. Their mean methylation rate (%Meth(94-102)) was different between genotypes for DPP4 polymorphisms rs13015258 (P = 0.001), rs17848915 (P = 0.0004), and c.1926 G>A (P = 0.001). The %Meth(94-102) correlated negatively with DPP4 mRNA abundance (r = -0.25, P < 0.05) and positively with plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations (r = 0.22, P < 0.05), whereas DPP4 mRNA abundance correlated positively with plasma total-/HDL-cholesterol ratio (r = 0.25; P < 0.05). In the VAT of nondiabetic severely obese women, genotype-dependent methylation levels of specific CpG sites in the DPP4 promoter CpG island were associated with DPP4 gene expression and variability in the plasma lipid profile. Higher DPP4 gene expression in VAT and its relationship with the plasma lipid profile may be explained by actually unknown DPP4 biological effect or, to another extent, may also be a marker of VAT inflammation known to be associated with metabolic disturbances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".