MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992426789 · doi:10.1115/gt2007-27937

Experimental Characterization of the Damping of Fuel-Air Ratio Fluctuations Using Transfer Function Analysis

2007· article· en· W1992426789 on OpenAlexafffund
Wajid A. Chishty, Gilles Bourque, Marc Füri, Ibrahim Yimer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsRolls-Royce (Canada)National Research Council Canada
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsPéclet numberMechanicsConvectionTurbulenceDiffusionAttenuationTransfer functionPhysicsHeat transferCombustionThermodynamicsChemistryOpticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the theoretical and experimental framework used to characterize the capability of premixers used in Dry Low Emission (DLE) gas turbines to dampen fuel-to-air ratio (FAR) oscillations and thus serve as a passive control device for combustion noise. Based on a convection-diffusion volume model, transfer function analysis in the frequency-domain was used to describe the interaction between convection and turbulent diffusion mechanisms. The study showed that the best achievable damping was obtained when the ratio of convection to turbulent diffusion effects (expressed in terms of Peclet number) was unity. For this particular condition, the spreading of Residence Time Distribution (RTD) is optimal hence decreasing the coherence between incoming and outgoing perturbations. For large Peclet numbers, mixing mechanisms are not sufficient to dampen incoming FAR fluctuations and for very small Peclet numbers FAR perturbations can be communicated almost instantaneously to the premixer outlet, without attenuation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207