Petrography and genesis of spicular and columnar geyserite from the Whakarewarewa and Orakeikorako geothermal areas, North Island, New Zealand
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Domal masses of geyserite, which surround many geyser vents in the Whakarewarewa geothermal area, are formed largely of spicules, spicule columns, and shrub columns. The non-branching spicules and the branches of branching spicules, individually up to 3 cm high and 1 mm diameter, have a laminated core encased by siliceous cortex. Silicified microbes are rare in the core but common in the cortex. Silicified microbial mats and pseudodendrites are found in the crevices between neighbouring spicules. Shrub columns, up to 5 cm high and 1.5 cm in diameter, are formed of opal-A that was precipitated around a three-dimensional, branching, shrub-like microbial (?) structure. The shrub branches, which are hollow with scalloped walls, do not contain any evidence of the original microbes or minerals that formed them. Silicified microbial mats are present between the columns. Microbial boring and etching by acidic steam led to local diagenetic degradation of these columns. In the geyserite mounds at Whakarewarewa, spicules and spicule columns are common, whereas shrub columns are rare. Interbedding and intercalation of spicular geyserite with shrub columnar geyserite indicate, however, that these different morphologic entities probably formed under similar environmental conditions on the mounds around the geyser vents. Petrographic evidence shows that the spicules, spicule columns, and shrub columns grew through a combination of biotic and abiotic processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".