MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992503995 · doi:10.1520/gtj102123

Integrated Air Trap and Volume Gauge for Axis Translation Systems

2010· article· en· W1992503995 on OpenAlexaff
Julio Ángel Infante Sedano, Vinod K. Garga, Sai K. Vanapalli

Bibliographic record

VenueGeotechnical Testing Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrap (plumbing)Gauge (firearms)Geotechnical engineeringTranslation (biology)Volume (thermodynamics)GeologyPhysicsMeteorologyMaterials scienceChemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This Technical Note presents the design detail of a combined air trap and volume gauge burette used for flushing air bubbles from under ceramic disks in axis translation systems that are used to measure or apply matric suction to unsaturated soil specimens. Axis translation systems are commonly used in the testing of unsaturated soils to subject soil specimens to matric suction values greater than 1 atm. Diffused air may come out of solution and accumulate below the ceramic disk of the axis translation system, prompting to provide a flushing system to remove them. An apparatus consisting of two concentric glass tubes, alongside a graduated scale, two water vessels permitting the isolation of the water phase to reduce moisture exchange with the surrounding atmosphere, and connected to the flushing groove below the ceramic disk of the axis translation system through two plastic tubes was developed. The apparatus described permits an accurate measurement of the volume of water expelled from the specimen and can allow for the volume of diffused air flushed out.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeotechnical Testing JournalSame topicParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsFrench-language works237,207