MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992556237 · doi:10.4141/cjas06008

Energy and nutrient utilization responses of ducks to enzyme supplementation of soybean meal and wheat

2007· article· en· W1992556237 on OpenAlexaffvenue
O. Adeola, C. M. Nyachoti, Darryl Ragland

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Animal Science · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersSyracuse UniversityPurdue University
KeywordsXylanaseProteaseSoybean mealAmylaseMealAnimal scienceDry matterFood scienceNutrientChemistryBiologyAgronomyEnzymeBiochemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential benefits of exogenous dietary enzymes in duck nutrition have been studied to a limited extent. Thus, the effects of protease and a cocktail of xylanase, amylase, and protease (Avizyme) on dry matter (DM), energy and nitrogen (N) utilization from soybean meal (SBM) and wheat, respectively, were investigated in White Pekin ducks in two 102-h studies. In exp. 1, three dietary treatments consisting of SBM supplemented with 0, 7500, or 15 000 units of protease acitivity kg-1 of soybean meal were each tube-fed to 12 ducks (4.41 ± 0.302 kg). In exp. 2, three dietary treatments consisting of wheat supplemented with 0, 450 units of xylanase, 600 units of amylase, and 6000 units of protease activity kg-1 or 600 units of xylanase, 800 units of amylase, and 12 000 units of protease activity kg-1 of wheat were each tube-fed to eight ducks (4.07 ± 0.363 kg). All birds were tube fed 30 g of dextrose at 24 and 30 h after feed withdrawal. Thirty grams of each diet were tube-fed at 48 and 54 h after feed withdrawal. Excreta were quantitatively collected during the 54 h after the first feeding. Endogenous energy and N per bird in the 54 h collection period in exp. 1 were 50.7 kcal ± 27.51 kcal and 1.595 ± 0.635 g, respectively. Corresponding values for exp. 2 were 27.5 ± 16.7 kcal and 0.96 ± 0.619 g, respectively. Protease supplementation to SBM improved energy (P < 0.05) utilization and tended to improve DM and N (P < 0.10) compared with the control. The AME, AMEn, TME, and TMEn values were higher (P < 0.05) in protease-supplemented SBM than in control. Avizyme addition to wheat did not affect DM or N utilization (P > 0.10). The only response criteria improved (P < 0.05) by Avizyme supplementation of wheat were AMEn and TMEn. It is concluded that energy and nutrient utilization in White Pekin ducks can be improved with exogenous dietary enzyme supplementation. Key words: Exogenous enzymes, energy and nitrogen metabolism, wheat, soybean meal,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207