Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neste artigo, discutimos as mudanças recentes nas políticas de intervenção nos Centros Históricos de Recife e Salvador. Tanto no Bairro do Recife quanto no Pelourinho, as intervenções da década de 1990 se concentraram nas mudanças do uso local: de espaço degradado e pobre para um espaço de ‘cultura e lazer’ destinado às classes médias. Em meados da primeira década dos anos 2000, o que vemos, no entanto, são novas estratégias de re-elitização, na medida em que o uso social do espaço resultou ser mais amplo do que o esperado. O discurso de “devolver a cidade a seus habitantes” está, nesse segundo momento, cada vez menos presente, imperando abertamente a lógica do investimento e retorno financeiro. O que permanece perigosamente adiada é a discussão dos significados dos centros históricos e da memória capaz de ser transmitida por estes espaços singulares.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it