MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1992573292 · doi:10.1353/utq.2007.0191

Designing Modern America: Broadway to Main Street (review)

2007· article· en· W1992573292 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Andrea Most

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureStyle (visual arts)NarrativeUrban designMetropolitan areaUrban planningHistoryArt historyVisual artsArtEngineeringArchaeologyLiteratureCivil engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Designing Modern America: Broadway to Main Street Andrea Most (bio) Christopher Innes. Designing Modern America: Broadway to Main Street Yale University Press. xiv, 320. US $40.00 Designing Modern America: Broadway to Main Street argues that the central features of modern American design – from urban planning to fabric patterns – emerged from the theatrical imaginations of two highly productive designers, Joseph Urban and Norman Bel Geddes. 'From the beginning,' the book opens, 'the "style" of twentieth-century America was deliberately designed, and created by specific individuals ... [T]he people who led the way in consciously designing a new lifestyle for America made their reputations on Broadway and carried its theatricality over into everything they did.' This beautifully designed volume then goes on to show, in abundant detail, the extraordinary influence Urban and Bel Geddes had on numerous aspects of modern American material culture. Chapters on stage design and theatre architecture ground the two designers in their home territory – which ranged from the Ziegfeld Follies to the Metropolitan Opera. Then the narrative broadens to show the impact of Urban's and Bel Geddes's work on countless aspects of American culture. They designed common vehicles including cars, airplanes, and cruise ships. Bel Geddes, for example, designed both the Chrysler Airflow and the 1941 Nash. They worked on urban planning, skyscrapers, and [End Page 534] suburban developments; Urban designed the New School for Social Research, among others, while Bel Geddes developed prefabricated housing for middle-class families. They were likewise instrumental in product design, treating department store windows and amusement parks as stage sets, and reimagining refrigerators (Bel Geddes designed the 1935 Electrolux and the 1939 Frigidaire), stoves, vending machines (for Coca-Cola), and display advertising (for Shell Oil). Indeed, the wealth of data in the book, and the profusion of engaging images, compellingly demonstrates the remarkable force of these particular individuals on the aesthetic landscape of twentieth-century America. The second argument – that this force was inherently theatrical – is also convincing, although the book oddly tends to underplay the overwhelming theatricality of American culture by focusing almost exclusively on concrete instances in which 'real life' overtly copies the stage (as in the desire of society ladies to have gowns like the ones they see on Ziegfeld stars or homes like the ones they see in Hollywood movies). The book omits any sustained discussion of the theoretical or historical context for the theatricality of American culture, and this lapse leads to a number of points in which the argument feels forced or speculative (for example, Innes argues rather unconvincingly for Bel Geddes's influence on the work of urban planner Robert Moses). More extensive discussions about theatricality and the ways in which it operates beyond the literal stage would have made these speculative leaps unnecessary and would have considerably strengthened the overarching argument about Urban and Bel Geddes. As it stands, the narrative of Designing Modern America operates almost entirely outside of the voluminous scholarship of the past thirty years on American material and consumer culture. This works against the power of the material collected here, as much of the excellent scholarship in this area would have helped to contextualize and illuminate the significance of Bel Geddes's and Urban's contributions for both theatre and cultural history. (Alan Trachtenberg's Incorporation of America and Jackson Lears's Fables of Abundance are two examples of works that cover much of the same historical ground but are missing from this study.) Nonetheless, Designing Modern America makes available crucial information about the powerful influence of two men of the theatre on the twentieth-century American way of life. Andrea Most Andrea Most, Department of English, University of Toronto Copyright © 2007 University of Toronto Press Incorporated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Same topicTheatre and Performance Studies→French-language works237,207→