MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992582619 · doi:10.4161/15384101.2014.962849

Atypical cell cycle control over neural cell fate

2014· letter· en· W1992582619 on OpenAlexaff
Dorota Lubanska, Lisa A. Porter

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2014
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCyclin-dependent kinaseCDK inhibitorCyclin-dependent kinase 2Cell cycleCell biologyStem cellNeuroblastomaNeural crestCancer researchCellular differentiationCarcinogenesisCellGeneticsCell cultureCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuroblastoma is an aggressive pediatric cancer fuelled by inappropriate differentiation of immature cells within the ganglionic lineage. The heterogeneity of the disease, as most cancers, complicates diagnosis and treatment. In neuroblastoma this heterogeneity is well represented in both primary tumors and derived cell lines, and mirrors neural crest plasticity. Multiple studies over the years have attempted to elucidate the molecular basis driving the expansion of the stem-like population within aggressive neuroblastoma; however no study has adequately addressed the role of the core cell cycle machinery. This was the focus of our recent publication in Oncoscience.1 Decreases in activity of the G1/S cyclin dependent kinase (Cdk) Cdk2 and accumulation of the Cdk inhibitor p27Kip,1 supports functional differentiation. Indeed, Cdk2 inhibition is synthetic lethal in MYCN overexpressing neuroblastoma.2 Adult stem cells carefully balance inhibition of the cell cycle with limited expansion in vivo to enable development and regeneration while preventing pathogenesis. The Speedy/RINGO family of ‘cyclin-like’ proteins are capable of binding to and activating the Cdks via a unique mechanism to drive cell growth. Spy1-bound Cdks are not dependent on the classically defined post-translational modifications for activation, nor are they sensitive to suppression by the Cdk inhibitors, quite contrary they can actually promote the degradation of the Cdk inhibitor p27Kip,1 3. Consistent with this guise our group and others have shown that elevated Spy1 levels are capable of overriding numerous forms of senescence.4-6 Why would a cell evolve such a mechanism? We hypothesize that endogenously this may enable expansion of select stem cell populations during development and regeneration, as well as allowing for recovery of a variety of cell types from checkpoint responses. In support of this model, Spy1 has demonstrated roles in spinal cord regeneration and was found to possess stem-like qualities in the developing mammary gland, supporting a general role for Spy1 in select populations of adult stem or progenitor cells.4,7 More recently pathological levels of Spy1 have been implicated in supporting the symmetric expansion of the CD133+ population in human glioma.6 In one of the inaugural issues of Oncoscience we show that Spy1 supports prolonged clonal tumorsphere formation in neuroblastoma cell lines and expands cell populations enriched for markers of multipotency. We find that endogenous Spy1 levels are reduced during guided differentiation of the stem-like population in neuroblastoma and that preventing this downregulation leads to resistance to 13-cis-Retinoic Acid (RA)- induced differentiation. In the mammary gland we have previously reported that Spy1 expression is regulated downstream of c-Myc during normal development. In neuroblastoma we find that c-Myc protein levels correlate with that of Spy1 in all cell lines tested, the relevance for these observations in neuroblastoma pathogenesis remain to be tested. Forced silencing of Spy1 levels in neuroblastoma resulted in a decrease in tumorsphere number, and a reduction in the CD133+ population. Hence, our data supports a novel fundamental role for an atypical cell cycle mechanism in driving expansion of the neural crest stem cells that define the aggressive, drug resistant population in subsets of neuroblastoma. This discovery may represent an important opportunity to design Cdk inhibitor drugs to uniquely target subpopulations of cells within these aggressive neural tumors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207