Anticoagulant Therapy for Acute Venous Thromboembolism: What We Think We Know and What the Data Show for the Timing of Recurrent Events
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although heparin is administered to prevent early recurrences of venous thromboembolism (VTE) by preventing new thrombi, allowing old thrombi to attach to venous walls, and covering warfarin until it is therapeutic, heparin largely prevents late recurrences of VTE (after 5 days). The dreaded early occurrence of pulmonary embolism (PE) (on or before day 5) while waiting for the vitamin K antagonist to become antithrombotic did not occur among patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT), who received acencoumarol alone. Fewer total recurrences resulted if a therapeutic level of heparin was reached within the first 24 hours of treatment of DVT. Fewer total recurrences also resulted if heparin was consistently maintained at therapeutic levels. A recurrent VTE within 5 days, however, occurred infrequently in those in whom heparin was not given, or therapeutic levels were delayed or not maintained. The incidence of early recurrent VTE was not lower in those who received adequate heparin than in those who did not, although the data are sparse. The true incidence of early recurrent VTE is uncertain due to the broad confidence intervals for the observed frequency of early recurrent events. Later recurrences are the norm and may be reduced by early treatment with adequate heparin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".