MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992673783 · doi:10.4993/acrt.16.8

Individual Tissue Culture System in a Disposable Capsule with Hypoxic Atmosphere

2008· article· en· W1992673783 on OpenAlexaff
Satoru Kaneko, Kiyoshi Takamatsu, Joji YOSHIDA, Keisuke Miyaji, Hiromichi Ishikawa, Toru Kawamata, Naoshi Shinozaki

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Cancer Research and Therapy · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoom air distributionAtmosphere (unit)CapsuleVolume (thermodynamics)Tissue cultureMedicineBiomedical engineeringChromatographyChemistryBotanyBiologyPhysicsBiochemistryIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present study, a novel system for the hypoxic culture of individual tissues was established for the subculturing of cell lines for research as well as for clinical culture of primary cells. To provide a hypoxic environment throughout the process of tissue handling and culture, we designed a clean bench with CO2 gas circulation and a hypoxic culture incubator containing disposable capsules. The bench top was covered with an acrylic chamber, and an atmosphere of 5.0% CO2-air was maintained using a sensor control. The cleanliness class of the chamber could easily be improved to 1 within 5 min of circulative filtration, even though it was found to be 105 before the unit was operated. Gas buffer solution (220 ml of 20 mM HEPES, 25 mM NaHCO3, pH 7.4) placed in a 500-ml plastic capsule in the unit stabilized the culture environment by functioning as a heat storage and gas pool. The inflow of air that occurred by the cap of the capsule was opened was excluded by the infusion of purging gas (5.0% CO2 and 95% N2); the O2 level returned to 2.0% within 4 min, after which the gas supply automatically switched to the culture gas (2.0% O2, 5.0% CO2, and 93% N2). If this purging process was omitted, restoration of the O2 level required 120 min, even though the inner volume was only 280 ml.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Cancer Research and TherapySame topicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsFrench-language works237,207