Effect of interfacial slippage on the near-tip fields of an interface crack between a soft elastomer and a rigid substrate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the role of interfacial slippage in the deformation and stress fields near the tip of a plane interface crack occurring between a compressible hyperelastic material and a rigid substrate. Specifically, we draw comparisons between the two limiting cases of ‘no-slip’ (infinitely high friction) and ‘frictionless’ (zero friction) surfaces by performing corresponding asymptotic analyses in the crack-tip region. Our results indicate that for the no-slip case, when the body is subjected to far-field loading, the crack deforms to a wedge-like shape consistent with experimental observations reported in the literature. Moreover, in this case, the wedge angle is shown to be directly related to ratios of various Cauchy stress components on the bonded surface in the near-tip region. Finite-element simulations reveal that the wedge angle also depends on material compressibility and the far-field loading conditions. By contrast, the analysis of the frictionless case reveals that the crack consistently opens into a smooth parabolic shape with a right wedge angle and near-tip stress field dominated by the normal stress at the surface. The results established here can be used as a basis for the understanding of the role of varying degrees of slippage on interfacial cracks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".