MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1992686398 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011779

Weak lensing analysis of MS 1008–1224 with the VLT

2002· article· en· W1992686398 on OpenAlexaff
R. Athreya, Y. Mellier, Ludovic Van Waerbeke, R. Pelló, B. Fort, M. Dantel-Fort

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
FundersIndo-French Centre for the Promotion of Advanced Research
KeywordsMass distributionPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxyWeak gravitational lensingRedshiftGravitational lensGalaxy clusterAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a gravitational lensing analysis of the cluster of galaxies MS 1008–1224 (), based on very deep observations obtained using the VLT with FORS1 and ISAAC during the science verification phase. Two different mass reconstruction algorithms were applied to the B-, V-, R- and I-band data to obtain similar projected mass distributions in all the bands. The FORS1 (BVRI) and ISAAC (JK) data were combined to determine the photometric redshift distribution of galaxies within the ISAAC field and to estimate the mass. We inferred from weak shear a minimum mass of on large scales (within ~ h-1 kpc, diameter) which agrees well with the X-ray mass mass estimate. The Mass-to-light ratios are also in excellent agreement. The observed mass profile is consistent with Pseudo-Isothermal Sphere models as well as a Navarro, Frenk and White model. In the inner regions the lensing mass is about twice as high as the X-ray mass which supports the long-held view that complex physical processes occuring in the innermost parts of lensing-clusters are mainly responsible for the X-ray-lensing mass discrepancy. We found that the central part of the cluster comprises two mass peaks whose center of mass is located 10–20 arcsec north of the cD galaxy. A similar offset between the cD and the peak of the X-ray distribution has been reported before. The optical, X-ray and the mass distributions show that MS 1008–1224 is composed of several subsystems which are probably undergoing a merger. It is likely that the gas is not in equilibrium in the innermost regions which vitiates the X-ray mass estimate there. We discovered that MS 1008–1224 shows a remarkable case of cluster-cluster lensing. The photometric redshifts show an excess of galaxies located 30 arcsec south-west of the cD galaxy at a redshift of ~0.9. This distant cluster is therefore also lensed by MS 1008–1224, which, if confirmed with spectroscopic data, would make this the first known case of magnification of a distant cluster by another one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→