Parenteral Nutrition-Associated Liver Disease: a Retrospective Study of Ursodeoxycholic Acid Use in Neonates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To verify the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) on the duration of neonatal parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of neonates in intensive care between 2004 and 2007 presenting with parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease. RESULTS: Of 118 eligible infants, 64 received UDCA. Cholestasis lasted longer in the UDCA group (79 vs. 50 days, p=0.001). However, treatment was delayed for a median of 24 days after cholestasis onset. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed no association between UDCA and cholestasis duration. The rate of decline of conjugated bilirubin was greater in treated patients (median 0.084 mg/dL/day vs. 0.60 mg/dL/day; p=0.009) and weight gain was greater (22.8 vs. 17.7 g/kg/day, p=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: UDCA therapy was not associated with the duration of parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease. A delay in treatment initiation might explain this result. UDCA therapy was associated with a faster decline of conjugated bilirubin and greater weight gain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".