Structurally delineating stromal interaction molecules as the endoplasmic reticulum calcium sensors and regulators of calcium release‐activated calcium entry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) lumen stores a crucial source of calcium (Ca2+) maintained orders of magnitude higher than the cytosol for the activation of a plethora of cellular responses transmitted in health and disease by a mutually efficient and communicative exchange of Ca2+ between compartments. A coordination of the Ca2+ signal is evident in the development of Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ (CRAC) entry, vital to lymphocyte activation and replenishing of the ER Ca2+ stores, where modest decreases in ER luminal Ca2+ induce sustained increases in cytosolic Ca2+ sourced from steadfast extracellular Ca2+ supplies. While protein sensors that transduce Ca2+ signals in the cytosol such as calmodulin are succinctly understood, comparative data on the ER luminal Ca2+ sensors is only recently coming to light with the discovery that stromal interaction molecules (STIMs) sense variations in ER stored Ca2+ levels in the functional regulation of plasma membrane Orai proteins, the major component of CRAC channel pores. Drawing from data on the role of STIMs in the modulation of CRAC entry, this review illustrates the structural features that delimit the functional characteristics of ER Ca2+ sensors relative to well known cytoplasmic Ca2+ sensors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".