MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992752034 · doi:10.1039/b100312g

Determination of As, Sb, Se, Sn and Hg in beer and wort by direct hydride generation sample introduction−electrothermal AAS

2001· article· en· W1992752034 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Henryk Matusiewicz, Małgorzata Mikołajczak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical chemistry methods development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsChemistryHydrideDetection limitAtomic absorption spectroscopyCertified reference materialsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Separator (oil production)AnalyteGraphiteGraphite furnace atomic absorptionChromatographyAbsorbanceThioureaRepeatabilityHydrogen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method is described for the hydride generation atomic absorption (HG-AAS) determination of As, Sb, Se, Sn and Hg in untreated samples of beer and wort using a batch system and in situ preconcentration of the analytes onto the Pd- (for As, Sb, Se, Sn) or Au-pretreated (for Hg) interior wall surfaces of a graphite furnace. Samples were degassed by filtration and the hydride was generated in the presence of an antifoam agent. Instrument parameters, hydride generation, transportation and trapping were selected. Determination of the total concentration of these elements was obtained after a previous reduction with thiourea. To minimize the amount of moisture from the reaction vessel reaching the graphite tube, an extra gas–liquid separator was installed in line. For 10 mL of sample, detection limits (LOD, 3σblank, peak height) of 28, 21, 10, 50 and 90 ng L−1 were obtained for As, Sb, Se, Sn and Hg, respectively, reflecting overall generation/collection efficiencies of 53, 100, 54, 57 and 66%, respectively. The detection limits were restricted by variations in the blank absorbance. Precision of replicate determination was typically 5% RSD at a concentration 50-fold above the LOD for a 10 mL sample volume. The accuracy of the method was confirmed by comparing the results obtained with those found for beer and wort using microwave-assisted digestion and by analysing five certified reference materials. Data comparable with those obtained by hydride generation after microwave-assisted digestion of samples were found for a series of natural samples, giving evidence of the applicability of the developed methodology to directly determining analytes. Calibration was achieved via the method of standard additions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Analytical Atomic SpectrometrySame topicAnalytical chemistry methods developmentFrench-language works237,207