A first generation Atlantic halibut <i>Hippoglossus hippoglossus </i>(L.) microarray: application to developmental studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An oligonucleotide microarray containing 50‐mer oligonucleotides representing 9277 unique Atlantic halibut Hippoglossus hippoglossus genes has been designed, printed and is currently being used for the study of gene expression in developing halibut. The oligonucleotides are based on all the Atlantic halibut data available at the time of printing, these included expressed sequence tags (ESTs) and complete cDNAs derived from the Pleurogene sequencing project as well as sequences deposited in GenBank by other groups as of September 2006. Of the Pleurogene ESTs, 5040 are functionally annotated; the remainder are unknown (1016) or are similar to unannotated sequences in GenBank (1626). In addition to Atlantic halibut features, several control features have been incorporated, including an oligonucleotide representing a heterologous plant gene (92 spots) and empty spots containing buffer only (1344). The array contains 48 subgrids, each comprised of 32 columns and 26 rows. Every feature is printed at least four times as side‐by‐side quadruplicates, resulting in a microarray containing 39 936 features. This microarray has been utilized to identify genes differentially expressed in larval Atlantic halibut during the developmental period from post‐hatch to post‐metamorphosis. Early in development, transcription of the gene for hatching enzyme was down‐regulated, whereas a gene involved in eye development was up‐regulated. Midway to metamorphosis, transcription of genes encoding several key digestive enzymes was up‐regulated, and in pre‐metamorphic larvae, transcription of genes encoding muscle proteins was prominent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".