MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992769594 · doi:10.1002/rcm.2622

Mass spectrometry study of hemoglobin‐oxaliplatin complexes in colorectal cancer patients and potential association with chemotherapeutic responses

2006· article· en· W1992769594 on OpenAlexafffund
Rupasri Mandal, Michael B. Sawyer, Xing‐Fang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOxaliplatinChemistryColorectal cancerMass spectrometryHigh-performance liquid chromatographyChromatographyInductively coupled plasma mass spectrometryHemoglobinCancerInternal medicineBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oxaliplatin is the most active platinum (Pt)-containing anticancer drug for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. We report here the study of potential association of the levels of oxaliplatin-protein complexes in 19 cancer patients with treatment efficacy using size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (HPLC/ICPMS) and nanoelectrospray ionization mass spectrometry (nanoESI-MS) techniques. Blood samples from 19 colorectal cancer patients were collected at 1 and 48 h after the first infusion of oxaliplatin. HPLC/ICPMS quantification of the oxaliplatin-protein complexes showed that the levels of Pt-protein complexes in plasma samples at 48 h were reduced by approximately 50% compared to those at 1 h, whereas those in hemolysates did not change significantly. The concentrations of hemoglobin (Hb)-oxaliplatin complexes determined by HPLC/ICPMS ranged from 3.1 to 8.7 microM. NanoESI-MS analysis of the patient hemolysates showed three distinct mass spectral profiles of the Hb-oxaliplatin complexes: (1) 1:1, (2) 1:1 with 1:2, and (3) multiple complexes of 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, and 1:4, corresponding to the Hb-oxaliplatin complex concentrations determined by HPLC/ICPMS. Potential association of variables including Hb-oxaliplatin complex concentrations with time to progress as the treatment efficacy indicator was analyzed using the Cox model. Multivariate analysis of the potential predictors showed that the statistically significant variables were Hb-oxaliplatin complex concentration (p = 0.02), performance status (p = 0.02), baseline neutrophil count (p = 0.05), and the site of the primary cancer (colon vs. rectal, p = 0.01). The hazard ratio for the concentration of the Hb-oxaliplatin complexes was 2.4, suggesting that the risk of cancer progression significantly increased with increasing of Hb-oxaliplatin complexes in patients. These results demonstrate that the level of the Hb-oxaliplatin complexes in erythrocytes is a potential biomarker for indicating inter-patient variations in oxaliplatin treatment efficacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.809

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRapid Communications in Mass SpectrometrySame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207