Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heat transfer in a spiral heat sink is examined experimentally and analytically. The spiral channel was fabricated on a base plate of copper. The cross section of the channel is square with 1 mm sides. A copper cap plate was bolted tight to seal the channel. Water and four low viscosity silicone oils (0.65 cSt, 1 cSt, 3 cSt and 10 cSt) were used as a medium; thus a Prandtl number from 5 to 100 was examined. Tests considered fluid entering from the side of the heat sink and exiting from the middle of heat sink and entering from the side and exiting from the middle. Heat transfer behavior over a wide range of flow rates from laminar to turbulent has been examined. Enhancement due to the spiral geometry was observed, and no significant difference was reported between the side and middle inlet condition. The dimensionless mean wall flux and the dimensionless thermal flow length were used to analyse the experimental data instead of Nusselt number and channel length. The spiral channel has been discretized, so that a single Dean number can be assumed in each cell, and two current models were applied to obtain the average Nusselt number. These are used to obtain the dimensionless mean wall flux and comparisons made with the experimental points.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".