The meiotic differentiation program uncouples S-phase from cell size control in<i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cell size homeostasis in proliferating cell populations is maintained in part by linking the initiation of a cell division cycle to growth such that a specific "size threshold" must be achieved prior to cell cycle initiation. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae the size threshold is responsive to environmental conditions and cell cycle entry is initiated at smaller sizes in poor growth medium and larger sizes in rich medium. In response to starvation for nitrogen and glucose diploid S. cerevisiae abandon proliferation and initiate gametogenesis (sporulation). The ability of both small and large cells to sporulate was investigated and the data reported here indicate that very small S. cerevisiae cells derived from the SK1 genetic background are able to sporulate. Although larger cells progress through the process more rapidly than small cells, sporulation of very small cells appears to be normal as they undergo meiotic recombination and form viable spores. Genetic analysis indicates that this trait is determined by multiple genes and may explain why some S. cerevisiae strains appear to display a minimal size threshold for sporulation. These data support a model where cell size controls can be bypassed or profoundly altered specifically to allow cellular differentiation in response to environmental signals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".