Bound state properties and astrophysical applications of negatively charged hydrogen ions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Highly accurate energies and other bound state properties of the negatively charged hydrogen ions, 1H−, D−, T−, and ∞H−, are presented. The computed expectation values include the electron–nucleus and electron–electron delta-functions and cusp values, triple delta-functions and some other geometrical and kinematical properties. All variational energies and bound state properties determined in this study are significantly more accurate than results known from earlier computations in the literature. In particular, the total energies obtained in this study are −0.527 751 016 544 377 196 566 8 a.u. (the ∞H− ion), −0.527 649 048 202 999 950 354 0 a.u. (the T− ion), −0.527 598 324 686 477 854 280 5 a.u. (the D− ion) and −0.527 445 881 114 178 893 391 1 a.u. (the 1H− ion). The method used in this study is a fully nonadiabatic variational approach. A few important astrophysical applications are discussed for the H− ions, including their photodetachment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".