A Comparative Study of the Effects of Hemin and Bilirubin on Bilateral Renal Ischemia Reperfusion Injury
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of hemin, a heme oxygenase-1 inducer, and bilirubin on renal ischemia-reperfusion (I-R) injury. METHODS: 40 Wistar-Albino rats were allocated into six groups as follows: sham (S), bilirubin (B), hemin (H), ischemia/reperfusion (IR), IR + bilirubin (IRB) and IR + hemin (IRH). Conjugated bilirubin (20 mg.kg(-1) i.v.) was given to rats in groups B and IRB, and hemin (50 mg.kg(-1) i.p.) was given to rats in groups H and IRH just prior to reperfusion. Renal I-R was achieved by occluding the renal arteries bilaterally for 50 min. Following 6 h of reperfusion, blood was drawn to study BUN, creatinine and bilirubin, and tissue samples were harvested to determine the renal malonyldialdehyde and heme oxygenase-1 levels, and for histopathologic grading. RESULTS: BUN, creatinine and malonyldialdehyde levels in group IRH were similar to controls whereas the results of groups IR and IRB were significantly higher (p < 0.01). There was a grade 2 damage in all I-R groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed the preventive effect of hemin on renal ischemia reperfusion injury. Administration of exogenous bilirubin did not prevent the I-R injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it