MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992948856 · doi:10.1021/ef900266d

Screening of Binders for Pelletization of CaO-Based Sorbents for CO<sub>2</sub>Capture<sup>†</sup>

2009· article· en· W1992948856 on OpenAlexaff
Vasilije Manović, Edward J. Anthony

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSorbentPelletizingCalcium loopingElutriationBentoniteThermogravimetric analysisMaterials scienceChemical engineeringPelletSorptionSinteringCalcinationPelletsChemistryAdsorptionComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CaO-based CO 2 looping cycle technology is a promising method for separation of CO 2 from flue gas and syngas at high temperatures. The process of CO 2 capture is expected to take place in fluidized-bed combustion (FBC) systems, which implies significant attrition and elutriation of the solid sorbent. Hence, both reactivation of spent sorbent and preparation of modified CaO-based sorbent may be required to maximize the performance of the sorbent. One of the more promising methods to achieve reactivation, namely, hydration, seems to produce very fragile particles, which are unlikely to be suitable for FBC applications. Thus, it is expected that pelletization of the obtained powder may be required. In this paper, we present initial results on the screening of suitable binders for pelletization. Two types of bentonite (Na- and Ca-bentonite) and four types of commercial calcium aluminate cements (CA-14, CA-25, Secar 51, and Secar 80) were investigated here, with a primary focus of maintaining a high CO 2 -capture capacity over 30−35 cycles. The tests were carried out using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA), and the results showed that the presence of bentonites led to faster decay in activity as a result of the formation of calcium-silica compounds with low melting points, which leads to enhanced sintering. This is confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and also X-ray diffraction (XRD), which showed the presence of spurrite [Ca 5 (SiO 4 ) 2 CO 3 ] as the dominant compound in the pellet after this series of cycles. Better results were obtained with no binder, i.e., by hydration of lime, where Ca(OH) 2 plays the role of the binder. Promising results were obtained also with calcium aluminate cements, where no effect of sintering because of the presence of these binders was noticed. Thus, on the basis of this study, the use of calcium aluminate cements for pelletization of CaO-based sorbent is recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations122
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicChemical Looping and Thermochemical ProcessesFrench-language works237,207