MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1992976059 · doi:10.1029/2000jd900500

Methane and soil and plant community respiration from wetlands, Kejimkujik National Park, Nova Scotia: Measurements, predictions, and climatic change

2001· article· en· W1992976059 on OpenAlexaffabout
M. Dalva, T. R. Moore, Paul A. Arp, Thomas A. Clair

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of New BrunswickMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaEnvironmental scienceWetlandPeatFlux (metallurgy)Water tableRespirationSoil respirationAtmospheric sciencesHydrology (agriculture)National parkSoil waterEcologySoil scienceOceanographyChemistryGeologyBiologyBotanyGroundwater

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A static, dark chamber technique was used weekly from mid‐July to mid‐November in 1995 and biweekly from mid‐May to late November in 1996, to measure methane (CH4) flux and soil and plant community respiration of CO2 from 36 sites in two wetlands in Kejimkujik National Park in south‐central Nova Scotia, Canada. Overall mean fluxes of CH4 were 43 mg m−2 d−1 in 1995 and 20 mg m−2 d−1 in 1996. Respiration rates were 5.1 g CO2 m−2 d−1 in 1995 and 3.2 g CO2 m−2 d−1 in 1996. Fluxes of CH4 and CO2 were related to microtopography and ecological grouping, depth to water table, and air and peat temperatures. Edge and hummock sites showed the lowest CH4 flux and the highest respiration rate, while pools showed the highest CH4 and lowest respiration rate. Gas emissions displayed a strong seasonal pattern with highest values occurring during the summer (June to August) and with a marked reduction in late fall. Depth to water table and air temperature explained 34 to 43% of the variance in CH4 flux and respiration from the sites over the 2 years (n = 666 to 824). We developed algorithms relating the daily mean flux of CH4 and respiration from the wetlands to an aspatial soil moisture, water table, and temperature model (ForHyM2) applied to the wetland basins. We then applied this model to calculated May to October fluxes of CH4 and CO2 from 1966 to 1998. We estimated that CH4 fluxes ranged from 2.8 to 7.4 g m−2, with a mean of 3.7 g m−2 and a standard deviation of 1.2 g m−2 over the 1966–1998 period. Respiration estimates ranged from 0.60 to 1.16 kg CO2 m−2, with a mean of 0.74 kg CO2 m−2 and a standard deviation of 0.11 kg CO2 m−2. Application of a 2xCO2 General Circulation Model scenario to temperature and precipitation for this part of eastern Canada resulted in increases of growing season CH4 emissions from 4.7 to 11.4 g m−2 and respiration from 0.77 to 1.32 kg CO2 m−2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207