MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1993006174 · doi:10.1359/jbmr.050213

Effects of Intravenous Pamidronate Treatment in Infants With Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Clinical and Histomorphometric Outcome

2005· article· en· W1993006174 on OpenAlexaff
Craig F. Munns, Frank Rauch, Rose Travers, Francis H. Glorieux

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Mineral Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteogenesis imperfectaCancellous boneSurgeryLumbarOsteoporosisInternal medicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: Clinical and histomorphometric outcome was compared between children with OI who had received pamidronate since infancy and age-matched patients who had never received pamidronate. Pamidronate was associated with improved vertebral shape and mass, higher cortical width, increased cancellous bone volume, and suppressed bone turnover. INTRODUCTION: Observations in small patient series indicate that infants with severe osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) benefit from treatment with cyclical intravenous pamidronate. However, detailed analyses of outcome are lacking for this age group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical outcome was evaluated in 29 children with OI types I (n = 3), III (n = 14), or IV (n = 12) who started pamidronate therapy before 2 years of age (age at treatment onset: median, 6 months; range, 2 weeks to 23 months) and who had completed 3 years of treatment (total annual pamidronate dose, 9 mg/kg). They were compared with a historical control group of 29 untreated children with severe OI who were matched for OI type and age at the 3-year treatment time-point. In addition, iliac bone histomorphometry was compared between 24 pamidronate-treated patients and 24 age-matched OI patients who had not received pamidronate. RESULTS: Morphometric evaluation of lumbar vertebrae (L(1)-L(4)) showed that the shape of vertebral bodies was better preserved in pamidronate-treated patients. This was accompanied by significantly higher lumbar spine areal and volumetric BMD (+110 and +96%, respectively) and a larger vertebral bone volume (+26%) on densitometry. Regarding mobility function, the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory gross motor score was 50% greater in the pamidronate group (p < 0.001). Iliac bone histomorphometry showed 61% higher cortical width and 89% higher cancellous bone volume in pamidronate-treated patients. Bone formation rate per bone surface in the pamidronate group was only 17% that of untreated patients. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this study suggests that cyclical pamidronate treatment started in infancy leads to improved bone strength and better gross motor function but also suppresses bone turnover markedly. It is therefore prudent to reserve pamidronate treatment to infant OI patients who present with a moderate to severe phenotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations151
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Mineral ResearchSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207