Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a new configuration of a haptic device based on a 4-DOF hybrid spherical geometry. The spherical parallel ball support (SPBS) type device, as it is referred to, consists of a particular design with the intersecting axes of both active and passive spherical joints. The orientation of the device is determined by the mobile platform on the active spherical joint using a special class of spherical 3-DOF parallel geometry. The passive spherical joint (ball and socket configuration) is used to increase the mechanical fidelity of the device. Previously it has been shown that some configurations of this spherical parallel geometry lead to kinematic optimization. We introduce the design consisting of a stylus such as a laparoscopic gripper attached on the mobile platform supporting an additional translational motion. First, the new forward and inverse kinematics analysis is presented. Our work is motivated by deriving a closed-form solution of the kinematics for this proposed device configuration. Then, a closed-loop system framework which can be used for real-time force feedback control is outlined. Finally, preliminary experimental results obtained with the prototype are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".