The effect of an axial electric field on the nonlinear stability between two uniform stream flows of finitely conducting cylinders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Weakly nonlinear streaming instability of two conducting fluids with an interface is presented for cylinders of circular cross section. The two fluids are subjected to a uniform axial electric field. Gravitational effects are neglected. The method of multiple scale perturbation is used to obtain a dispersion relation for the first-order problem and two nonlinear Schrödinger equations for the higher orders. The nonlinear Schrödinger equation, generally, describes the competition between nonlinearity and a linear dispersion relation. One of these equations is used to determine the nonlinear cutoff electric field separating stable and unstable disturbances, while the other is used to analyze the stability of the system. The stability criterion is expressed theoretically in terms of various parameters of the problem. Stability diagrams are obtained for different sets of physical parameters. New instability regions in the parameter space, which appear due to nonlinear effects, are indicated. PACS Nos.: 47.20, 47.55.C, 47.65
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".