La Guerre de Sept Ans Et Ses Consequences Atlantiques: Kourou Ou L'apparition D'un Nouveau Systeme Colonial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La signature du traité de Paris qui clôt en 1763 la guerre de Sept ans ruine définitivement le rêve d'une Amérique française. Souvent, à l'instar de Voltaire, on a considéré que la perte du Canada et de la Louisiane était négligeable, puisque l'on conservait les précieuses îles à sucre. Cette opinion est contredite par un exemple magistral, l'expédition de Kourou de 1763. Cette expédition marque le désir de Choiseul, secrétaire d'Etat à la Marine, de faire de la Guyane un brillant contrepoint de la domination britannique au nord, et ainsi d'établir ce qu'il nomme « un système d'Europe ». Cette volonté, et les agents qu'il emploie pour la concrétiser, marque ce que représentait, voire ce que pouvait apporter, un premier empire colonial français dont on venait, tardivement, de prendre conscience. The signing of the Treaty of Paris in 1763 put an end to the dream of a French America. The historiography of the period has often characterized the loss of Canada and the cession of Louisiana as negligible in the eyes of both the French population and the French government. The example of the 1763 Kourou expedition contradicts this view and demonstrates that the Duke of Choiseul intended to establish what he called “a system of Europe” in French Guyana. Choiseul's ambition was to make Guyana the counterpoint of British domination in North America. His intention and the means used to achieve it indicate what this first French colonial empire represented and its potential benefits, which were only belatedly acknowledged.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".