Transforming Growth Factor-β2 Is a Transcriptional Target for Akt/Protein Kinase B via Forkhead Transcription Factor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tumors evade cell death by constitutively activating cell survival pathways and suppressing intrinsic death machinery. Activation of cell survival pathways leads to transcriptional repression of genes associated with cell death and activation of ones promoting anti-apoptosis. Akt/protein kinase B phosphorylates forkhead transcription factors and prevents their nuclear localization, leading to repression of genes involved in apoptosis, such as Fas ligand (FasL). Using bioinformatic approaches, we have identified three consensus sequences for forkhead transcription factor binding in transforming growth factor beta2 (TGF-beta2) promoter. TGF-beta inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis in many cell types, and acquisition of TGF-beta resistance is linked to tumorigenesis. In this study, we show that activated Akt down-regulates TGF-beta2 promoter, and sequences within the promoter that are related to consensus forkhead binding sites are necessary for repression. Forkhead factor FKHRL1 binds in vitro to the three consensus sequences and can activate TGF-beta2 promoter in normal and Akt-transformed cell lines. In human breast and pancreatic tumors, activated Akt expression correlated with down-regulation of TGF-beta 2 mRNA levels. A number of tumor cells expressing activated Akt were responsive to TGF-beta addition, indicating the presence of an intact TGF-beta-signaling pathway. These results suggest that repression of TGF-beta 2 promoter activity in cells expressing activated Akt may play a role in promoting tumorigenesis and escape from the growth-inhibitory and/or apoptotic effects of TGF-beta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".