Interannual variability of sperm reserves and fecundity of primiparous females of the snow crab (<i>Chionoecetes opilio</i>) in relation to sex ratio
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Demographics of adults and reproductive condition of primiparous (first brood) females of the snow crab (Chionoecetes opilio) were monitored annually from 1994 to 2002 at a fished site to investigate the possibility that sperm supply limits embryo production. Abundance of primipara fluctuated 533-fold because of a recruitment pulse, and this caused a large oscillation in the sex ratio of adult males to primipara. Annual mean of stored ejaculate weight (SL) and potential fecundity index (PF, clutch weight × percent fertilized eggs) adjusted to constant primipara carapace width ranged from 31 to 130 mg by spermatheca and from 1.97 to 3.43 g by clutch, respectively. Annual mean of SL and number of stored sperm (range 3.81 × 106 to 35.00 × 106 sperm by spermatheca) decreased when sex ratio decreased, probably because of a combined reduction of sperm allocation and female promiscuity. Annual mean PF was negatively correlated with abundance of small males, which may reflect egg losses during postoviposition matings. Although sociosexual context has a large impact on reproductive condition of primipara, the possibility that sperm supply limits embryo production could not be confirmed or excluded because of the complexity of snow crab mating behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".