Inflammatory bowel disease in children: the role of a positive family history
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate any potential influence of a family history of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on the clinical phenotypes and the course of IBD in children. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the notes of 411 children with the diagnosis of IBD, 244 (59.4%) with ulcerative colitis, 129 (31.4%) with Crohn's disease and 38 (9.2%) with IBD unclassified, who were admitted to our department between 1 January 1981 and 31 December 2007 were reviewed. The aim was to assess the prevalence of familial IBD and its impact on the age of disease onset, clinical phenotypes according to the Montreal classification, course and outcome of disease. The control group consisted of IBD children without a family history of IBD, who were admitted to the hospital during the same time period. RESULTS: Thirty five (8.5%) children had a family history of IBD, (ulcerative colitis 6.6%, Crohn's disease 10.9% and IBD unclassified 13.2%). Sixty-eight percent of the 22 pairs of first-degree relatives were concordant for the clinical phenotype of disease. Significantly, more children with familial IBD had symptom onset and/or disease diagnosis before 5 years of age compared with sporadic IBD (P = 0.01 and P = 0.014, respectively); however, no differences were seen in sex, clinical phenotypes, need for aggressive treatment and/or surgery. CONCLUSION: Children with familial IBD had earlier onset of disease compared with those with sporadic IBD. However, this had no significant impact on the clinical phenotypes, the course and/or the outcome of disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".